A structured approach to ESG evaluation
Our structured approach to incorporating ESG considerations into our credit analysis seeks to provide a comprehensive view of the unique risks faced by each issuer and the mitigating factors. The following components are key:
- Focusing on sector specific ESG risks
- Understanding materiality of the risks
- Evaluating how prepared the issuer is in dealing with ESG issues
- Assessing the issuer’s ESG practices relative to peers
- Engaging with issuers regularly on key ESG issues
It is important to identify the ESG risks that are specific to each sector as the risks (and their materiality) are unique for different sectors. Examples of sectors that face higher environmental related risks include steel and cement production (high carbon emissions), oil/gas exploration and production and ore mining (damage to ecosystem), as well as lead smelting and chemical production (toxic waste).
On the other hand, social risks rank higher for labour intensive manufacturing (workforce health and safety), data intensive technology and network (privacy/ data security), consumer products (product safety), and industrial estate development (community displacement).
Meanwhile, governance risks would be more relevant for the financial services sector and for countries where corporate/financial regulations, listing/reporting requirements, investor protection, bankruptcy laws and accounting standards are still developing or where the compliance and enforcement of such standards are weak.
Some sectors can have high exposures to more than one category of ESG risks. Standard & Poor’s Indicative Sector Risk Atlas (See Fig. 2.) shows that the metals & mining, chemicals as well as the oil & gas sectors experience high social and environmental risks.
Understanding materiality
An issuer can face a variety of ESG issues in its course of operations, but we focus on those that will have a material impact on its credit fundamentals - current or potential future impact on its operating or financial performance and hence its default potential.
At the same time, we are cognisant that the materiality of sector specific risks may change over time as regulations shift and operating models evolve. More stringent emission standards or heavier penalties for violations can increase compliance costs. Enhanced automation can reduce labour related risks although digitisation will increase data security risks. Changes in government policies such as a stricter oversight of the financial sector for example will lift governance risks.
To illustrate, assume a company has set up a chemical plant in a developing country where there are limited laws to regulate water pollution. As such, the risk of penalties or litigations for dumping chemical by-products into the river is minimal. The materiality of this risk rises as the government starts to put in place policies to improve environmental protection. If the company had acted responsibly at the onset by recycling its by-products and adopting proper waste disposal procedures, it will be less vulnerable to changes in regulations.
Evaluating preparedness
We evaluate how prepared an issuer is to deal with ESG risks by having a holistic picture of its policies and actions on the environmental, social and governance fronts, and how they evolve. With regard to the environmental risks, this can involve assessing whether the issuer has installed emission reduction or waste recycling equipment or makes use of energy/resource efficient technology. Employee training programs, on the other hand, together with diversity policies and active customer engagement can help to address social risks. Meanwhile, independent board representation, fair compensation polices, and greater information transparency will help reduce governance risks.
For example, let us assume that two coal mining companies face similar environmental and social risks. Only one has put in place a comprehensive plan around the decommissioning of the mine to ensure that the mining site is in a physically and chemically stable state post closure. This company will be in a better position to mitigate the potential ESG risks and their impact. Likewise, a company that sells a carbon intensive product but is successful in diversifying into lower carbon or green businesses will enjoy a more sustainable growth path.
Engagement
While bondholders are not able to vote on key company matters, it is still possible to influence an issuer’s ESG practices by highlighting key ESG issues to management and encouraging a more proactive approach to addressing the issues. Requests for better information disclosures can also be made through regular engagements with management.
Other considerations
Our comprehensive ESG evaluation framework also helps us identify opportunities and benefits arising from positive ESG practices. A manufacturing company, for example, that demonstrates commitment and effectiveness towards ensuring a healthy and safe workplace for its employees would, besides minimising accidents and medical related costs, also benefit from increased loyalty and productivity. In another example, a company that has invested in low emission machinery and as a result produces a level of carbon emission that is below the regulated level can sell the difference in the form of carbon credits4 to help subsidize the cost of the new machinery. That said, our ESG analysis tends to be skewed towards risk factors which are likely to have a more immediate and material impact on credit fundamentals.